Creating Offence

An new offence was created with just a few words and the stroke of a pen. Welcome to the left's brave new world

Creating Offence

Here's a live example of how leftists reshape culture, language and context on a whim. It's conclusive proof that what is okay one minute becomes 'offensive' simply because the radicals want to weaponise words for their own ends.

It began during the US Senate examination of Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney-Barrett.

Coney-Barrett is one of the most accomplished people ever to be nominated for such a position. She is eminently suitable for the position but it didn't stop the Democrats from launching their attacks.

They targeted Coney-Barrett's religious faith and tried to question her knowledge of the law. Her demeanour (and obvious patience when confronted by rampant stupidity) was further testament to her character.

Perhaps the dumbest Democrat is Mazie Hirono, a Senator from Hawaii. It is possible that just listening to her can diminish your own IQ.

Her opening salvo was to ask the nominee:

Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favours, or committed any physical or verbal harassment or assault of a sexual nature?

The answer from Coney-Barrett was no. But this didn't stop Hirono from asking a follow up question.

Have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?

Again the answer was no.

Now I must point out that this Democrat Senator strongly supports Joe Biden, who has been accused of the type of behaviour the Democrats try to project on their opponents. I guess she also voted for Bill Clinton and has a picture of JFK on her office walls too.

That suggests it's more political posturing than conviction that leads to such a line of questioning.

It got even more bizarre when another Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (California) asked if Coney-Barrett would wind back "hard-fought freedoms and protections for the LGBT community".

The nominee replied:

I have no agenda,I do want to be clear that I have never discriminated on the basis of sexual preference and would not discriminate on the basis of sexual preference.

This is where peak stupidity pounced with Hirono jumping in that the term sexual preference was 'offensive'.

Clearly this is a new revelation because a conga line of democrats have used that term without causing any offence at all. That includes recently deceased US Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Candidate Joe Biden.

Coney-Barrett was accused by the rainbow mafia of dog-whistling.

Just hours later, the Merriam-Webster  dictionary added a rider to their entry of the word 'preference' to announce that it is now deemed 'offensive'.

That's how quickly things change in the woke world. Things are perfectly fine one day and grounds for offence the next - depending on who they need to be the offender and the offended.

Our words, our actions and our history are continually hijacked by cultural vandals for their own ends. They redefine words to suit themselves. The rewrite history and ignore their own actions as the cause of many issues they blame on others.

Make no mistake, the left are the new oppressors and there is nothing they will not pollute to achieve their own ends.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Confidential Daily.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.