John Roskam from the Institute of Public Affairs highlights the failures of the fourth estate to hold our politicians (and other institutions) to account.
The government is pushing ahead with the rollout of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines. They say injecting this concoction into your body will do more good than harm.
They could even be right. After all, a stopped clock is correct at least twice a day
It may be that the deaths, aches, pains and nausea attributed to the vaccines are not really that important. After all we are saving the world from a virus with a mortality rate similar to the flu.
But don’t we vaccinate for the flu? Indeed we do, but that jab has had a lot more testing go into it than this latest rushed research.
But it’s not all guesswork on the vaccine front.
We do know that these vaccines don’t stop you getting the virus. They don’t stop you transmitting the virus.
Their purpose is to lessen the symptoms of a virus which most people infected don’t even know they have in the first place. That’s right, most people have few or no symptoms but we still need to jab the world - urgently
However, it’s what we don’t know that raises some questions. If you raise any such questions on social media platforms ( like Facebook) you’ll likely get banned but privately, even massive leftie hypocrite and global censor in chief Mark Zuckerberg has some concerns of his own.
"I Share Some Caution on this [Vaccine] Because We Just Don't Know the Long-Term Side Effects of Basically Modifying People's DNA and RNA"
You’ll also find some of these concerns published in reputable publications like the International Journal of Clinical Practice (28 October 2020).
It reported a study to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID‐19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.
The study detailed that no vaccine has ever been approved to deal with corona viruses previously ,is because the vaccine prompted a "harmful, inflammatory immune response" when a vaccinated test subject encounters a circulating virus.
In layman's terms, if you are vaccinated against a SARS type virus ( which Coronavirus is), should you be hit with another virus ( like influenza) the immune response will be much more severe than otherwise likely. This could make the flu ( or any other virus) much more deadly than would otherwise be the case.
The study admitted that there is limited data available on the current vaccines but referenced previous SARS research. They also point out that the limited data is a result of the truncated research and testing protocols. This means that the research testing was not as comprehensive as with previous SARS vaccines....which led to none of them being approved.
Consider that for a moment. Previous, comprehensive testing of SARS vaccines saw an unacceptable risk of death but the new COVID-19 vaccines underwent a less thorough testing protocol and have enjoyed a rushed approval.
It even concluded that the test patients were not sufficiently informed that the vaccine could make COVID-19 (and other virus) symptoms worse rather than better.
You still keen to be first in line or to get your Covid passport…indicating compliance with the greatest health experiment of all time?
Before you do, it might be wise to find out what they aren’t telling you.
Cory Bernardi is the author of seven books and has been a member of the Australian rowing team, a publican, an investment portfolio manager and spent nearly 14 years as an Australian Senator.
The Prime Minister has a delicate balancing act ahead of him. He needs to muscle up to China while re-establishing important trade markets for our products.
